Former Ethereum developer Virgil Griffith files a motion to dismiss charges against him.

Former Ethereum developer Virgil Griffith is seeking to have sanctions violation charges against him dismissed. FBI arrested him for delivering a lecture on Blockchain and crypto in North Korea.

The former Ethereum developer Virgil Griffith is seeking to have sanctions violation charges against him dismissed. Griffith recently filed a motion claiming that the government’s indictment is ‘fatally flawed’ and merits the case’s dismissal. He was arrested in November 2019 by the FBI after he made a presentation at a blockchain conference in North Korea earlier in the year. The U.S. government then went on to charge him with conspiracy to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). 

 

Prosecutors allege that Griffith taught North Korean officials how to evade sanctions. 

Prosecutors had alleged that he taught North Korean officials how to use Blockchain and digital currencies to evade U.S. sanctions. Now, in a motion for dismissal filed by his lawyer Brian Klein at the Southern District of New York, Griffith accused the prosecutors of “advancing through the indictment untested theories of the prosecution that are fatally flawed.” The government allegedly failed to set forth facts that amount to a criminal offense. Instead, it provided a short and vague indictment that fails to show how Griffith committed any crime, Griffith’s lawyer said.

 

“Griffith’s purported speech in North Korea is protected by the First Amendment.”

According to Klein, the former Ethereum developer allegedly received no payment for his purported presentation at the North Korean blockchain event. As such, his conduct in North Korea doesn’t amount to a service offered. The lawyer supported his argument by citing a 2003 ruling in which New York Judge Jed Rakoff defined service as “the performance of something useful for a fee.” The lawyer further said that Griffith’s purported speech in North Korea is exempted from the IEEPA and is protected by the First Amendment. Virgil Griffith also confined his purported remarks to information that’s already available in the public domain.

ADVERTISEMENT
Jai Pratap
Jai Pratap
A Mass Media Graduate who loves to write. Jai is also a sports enthusiast and a big movie buff. He loves to learn new things.

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Enable Notifications    Ok No thanks