Skip to content

Sam Bankman-Fried's Testimony Reveals FTX Failures, Shifts Blame to Underlings

Sam Bankman-Fried's testimony provides a candid account of FTX's downfall, attributing it to errors and downplaying allegations of malfeasance.

FTX Founder's Candid Testimony

Sam Bankman-Fried, the former FTX mogul facing charges of fraud and conspiracy, began his testimony by acknowledging mistakes that led to FTX's downfall and the harm caused to many individuals. His testimony aimed to present FTX as a well-intentioned business whose troubles resulted from errors, not malfeasance.

Attempt to Correct the Narrative

In his narrative, Bankman-Fried explained that certain features in FTX's software, which allowed Alameda Research to avoid position liquidation and maintain a negative balance, were implemented to address issues in the exchange's risk management system. He attributed the implementation of these features to the actions of his colleagues rather than his own directives.

Blame-Shifting Strategy

Throughout his testimony, Bankman-Fried adopted a strategy of shifting blame to former colleagues, specifically Gary Wang and Nishad Singh. He portrayed himself as a supervisor who allowed them to make their own decisions while he served in more of an advisory role. This strategy aims to distance him from allegations of wrongdoing.

Clashing Narratives

Bankman-Fried's testimony presented a contrast to prosecutors' allegations regarding FTX and Alameda's practices. For instance, he addressed the deletion of communications, explaining it as a practice to avoid potential legal complications, rather than an attempt to hide incriminating evidence.

The Role of Lawyers

Bankman-Fried's defense sought to implicate FTX lawyers in various aspects of the company's operations, particularly in the deletion of internal communications. However, the judge limited the scope of testimony concerning lawyers, permitting the discussion of FTX's document-retention policy.

The Public Face of FTX

Bankman-Fried also shared insights into his public image as the face of FTX. He explained that he had not initially intended to assume this role but was gradually thrust into it due to the success of his early interviews. Over time, it became challenging to find an alternative representative for FTX.

The Controversial Arena Sponsorship

A notable topic during the testimony was FTX's $10 million annual sponsorship of the Miami Heat's arena. Bankman-Fried justified this expenditure by stating that it amounted to 1% of FTX's revenue at the time and was deemed an appropriate investment due to the significant branding benefits.