Connect with us

Bitcoin

Bitcoin vs Dash: Comparing Bitcoin and Dash

Published

on

Lets compare Bitcoin vs Dash. The amazingness of the cryptocurrencies doesn't seem to be tangible enough relative to its complexities. Lets compare Bitcoin vs Dash

Understanding some of the prominent benefits of Dash over Bitcoin.

Introduction

Bitcoin is a very complicated cryptocurrency. Its mass adoption is not anything more than the fantasies of a dream, as the technology is too technical to be understood by the normal people. It is amazing, but not that simple to be effectively applied by the masses. Bitcoin scalability has always been a major point of concern and debate the community professionals, but doesn’t seem to be coming on any grounds regarding the matter. Also, the increase in the block size is been discussed for years together. The Crypto domain is to be a lot more ambiguous than it seems. It is no wonder that using the cryptos to transact is far more complex than using PayPal or Paytm. The amazingness of the cryptocurrencies doesn’t seem to be tangible enough relative to its complexities. Lets compare Bitcoin vs Dash.

 

Bitcoin vs Dash: Transactions

A long string of addresses feels quite unusual when one is extensively used to Fiat transfers. Currently, even the transaction fee has skyrocketed and if a particular transaction is not been attached with sufficient amount of transaction fees it might remain forever in the unconfirmed transaction pool itself. Hence even micropayments which were earlier possible seems to have been completely eradicated due to the high transaction fees.

On the other hand, the transactions on the Dash network is lightning fast when compared to Bitcoin. Dash even provides a special Insta send service which allows for a provision of getting the transactions confirmed quickly. Hence, people who aren’t patient enough to wait for hours together can opt for Dash. Due to the late confirmations price slippage might occur, which is another misery in itself.

Bitcoin vs Dash: Scalability issue

The dash community also strives to bring extensive cooperation between the stakeholders. This was clearly evident when the scalability issue daunted over Dash. The community members obviously had heated arguments as well as discussions but just within a span of 24 hours, they all decided to increase the block size. The problem which hasn’t been solved for years by the Bitcoin community and continues to persist even today. The problem was done in 1 day itself by the Dash community. The incident represents a strong oneness and reliability among them. This doesn’t mean that Dash is completely perfect but it’s ability to upgrade itself with time, is what matters, unlike Bitcoin.

There is also a PrivateSend feature available in the Dash network. By using this particular feature optional feature a user can completely hide his or her identity. As Dash is considered to be synonymous with Cash which has no digital footprint, this privacy feature undoubtedly adds to the convenience of the users.  

 

Bitcoin vs Dash: Community Funding and control

It is absolutely worth mentioning, where the funding comes from, for these organizations. As Bitcoin network is completely decentralized and hence a number of prominent cryptocurrency institutions have come forward in order to fund for the Bitcoin development and research. But there is a catch, with funding comes authority over the decisions, hence the institution which is funding the community the most, it is an unwritten rule that it has the most authority over the decision making.

Whereas this is not the case, for the Dash community as most of the funding is done by themselves only. 45% of the total Dash funds go to the miners, 45% is received by the master nodes of the network, and the remaining 10% is utilized for the for the development of the community. In this case, there are a number of prominent master nodes whose decisions are taken into account in order to reach a common conclusion.

Bitcoin vs Dash: Public address

Another feature of Dash is its public address. Here each and every public address is associated with a human-friendly name, similar to an email address rather than a string of random characters. The transactions are made simpler by giving names to the addresses so as to prevent the transactions to reach a wrong destination. Since, once the transactions are initiated they cannot be reverted back this feature is crucial, as it associates rememberable names to the address.

Conclusion

Although Bitcoin was the Pioneer in the cryptocurrency trend it undoubtedly cannot be considered as the best solution for the current financial practical scenario. The cryptocurrencies like Dash have been coming forward who have their own set of pros and cons. It all jots down, to the need for the day, where currently scalability is one of the major concern. Hence the cryptocurrency Dash seems to be more promising than Bitcoin.

#Banking

Alert: JP Morgan Coin: A threat to Bitcoin and XRP?

Published

on

The JP Morgan Coin is a centralized permissioned censorable blockchain based liquidity tool. People are saying that it should not be considered a cryptocurrency.

Jp Morgan, the bank run by Jamie Dimon is launching its own cryptocurrency. JP Morgan has $2.6 trillion in assets, $100 billion annual revenue, it moves more than $5 trillion in wholesale payments every single day and a quarter million employees. It is used by the investment banking crowd, asset management crowd, private banking, private wealth management, and the treasury & security services division. This tells us exactly for whom the JP Morgan Coin is designed for. These are the organizations that are going to be using it. The JPM Coin is a centralized permissioned censorable blockchain based liquidity tool. Many people are even saying that it should not be considered to be a cryptocurrency and it is just a bank coin.

 

The JP Morgan Coin:

The JP Morgan Coin is designed to be a stablecoin. They will be starting off with the USD and will be expanding to other key currencies over time. So it will be a global currency within their permission network. It will be providing real-time gross settlements rather than waiting for days for the payments to get cleared. The network participants can transfer tokenized fiat instantly, constantly and with full finality 24X7 which is a major improvement to how the things work currently. The previous model apart from bringing slow was also more prone to fraud and exposed to the old central bank failure and required multiple intermediaries across the interbank network.

The main use cases for the JP Morgan Coin will be international payments for sizeable corporate clients circumventing SWIFT and circumventing XRP. JP Morgan Coin may also be used for securities transactions. JP Morgan has previously tested a debt issuance on the blockchain and the token will allow institutional investors to buy debt issuance. Corporations could also use the JP Morgan treasury in order to take the place of their dollar holdings in their subsidiaries all over the world which will open more ways for the big corporate clients in order to move money back and forth.

The JP Morgan Coin will be on the quorum blockchain which is a permissioned version of Ethereum which JP Morgan has been using for some time. The quorum blockchain has already seen institutional use cases. Financial institutions can trust that only authorized parties can join their private ethereum network and that the transactions will be confidential. So the JP Morgan Coin is probably for a very small group of elites.

 

The History of JP Morgan:

There are dozens of fines that JP Morgan pays yearly all around the world for doing basically the same kind of things.

  • JP Morgan was fined $65 million for trying to vague the benchmark rate.
  • They were fined $1.6 million for failing to meet anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing laws in Hong Kong.
  • Citigroup and JP Morgan both had to pay a combined total of $182.5 million after being accused of violating anti-trust laws. Citigroup and JP Morgan allegedly the European Interbank offered rate.
  • JP Mogan was $135 million for improper handling of American Depositary Receipts.

In most of these cases, they are not actually found guilty of anything and they just settle. They don’t end up breaking any laws cause they just pay the huge amount of fine they are asked to pay.

After the announcement of the JP Morgan Coin, JP Morgan stocks have gone up because of JP Morgan’s clients, this is a welcome sign of innovation.

 

JP Morgan Coin vs XRP:

It seems that some banks want their own coin and not XRP which is the supposed to be the banker’s coin. They really don’t want XRP for one reason or the other. Although banks would not want to use the JP Morgan Coin as such they might just have their own coins in future such as Bank of America Coin or Bank of China Coin etc. But we have an interesting situation when it comes down to exchanging value between these banks because XRP is essentially a public ledger vs the JP Morgan Coin which is private. XRP has a permissionless ledger vs JP Morgan Coin has a permission ledger. JP Morgan controls the JP Morgan Coin but they do not control the XRP ledger and remember that the banks like to have control and maybe the other banks are also going to think like JP Morgan but there is still a lot of hope for XRP. JP Morgan Coin may not see very much interoperability between banks, therefore, they might need some kind of bridge and that bridge could end up being XRP.

 

Implications for Bitcoin:

There are not many implications for bitcoin at all. Most of the bitcoin enthusiasts have zero interest in things like the JP Morgan Coin. Bitcoin has amazing and unique value propositions and this is not a threat in any way to bitcoin. JP Morgan cannot control bitcoin it is really hard to manipulate the price of bitcoin whereas in case of JP Morgan Coin, they have direct control over it. The current rumors say that JP Morgan is going to use Bakkt for their clients who want to purchase, invest and hold bitcoin. So the JP Morgan Coin doesn’t have threat on bitcoin. Bitcoin is always superior in every way.

 

What are your thoughts on the JP Morgan Coin? Tell us in the comments section below.

Continue Reading

#Bitcoin

10 facts that prove that Craig Wright is not the real Satoshi Nakamoto

Published

on

A lot of people in the past has tried to claim that they are Satoshi. Let's discuss 10 reasons why Craig Wright is not the real Satoshi Nakamoto.

Everyone is aware of the impact that bitcoin has marked on today’s world. However, huge the success bitcoin gained in the financial market, more is the mystery about the inventor of bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto created bitcoin in 2008 and made it an open source in the year 2009. But Satoshi disappeared in 2010. No one knows how to salute Satoshi, whether he or she or they!

A lot of people in the past has tried to claim that they are Satoshi, however, all the claims have been proved and till date, no one has the identity of Satoshi. In this article, we will discuss 10 reasons why Craig Wright is not the real Satoshi Nakamoto.

 

1. Craig Wright has not proven the ownership of the private keys of Satoshi. Although he tried to make the non-technical journalists fool by presenting the verification scripts, even any average student using cmd (command line) tools can find out the deception in the verification script that he was trying to show as a proof of ownership of Satoshi’s private keys.

 

2. Jimmy Song, a famous Bitcoin developer and one of the popular person on Youtube for crypto space recently had few harsh words for the Craigh claims for Satoshi. Jimmy said that he believes that Wright holds zero credibility to be Satoshi and no one should listen to his false claims. He made fun of Wright by saying that Craig Wright is just like a fat kid who falsely claims that have a pretty girlfriend.

 

3. Even Vitalik Buterin, a famous personality in crypto space denied the opinions of Craig to be Satoshi. In one of his interviews, he said that if he really was Satoshi, he could have proved by a simple private key but he presented a complex and bogus proof to the public to prove that he was Satoshi. He said that he believes that all the claims by Craig are false.

 

4. Even if Craig was Satoshi, why a person would show the world that he owns million of bitcoin in the cryptographic way of proof so that anyone can easily steal that billion worthy digital coins? I mean just for the sake of proving the identity, why would someone invite the hackers to steal all the bitcoin? This seems completely irrelevant.

 

5. Craig in his process to prove himself tried to fool all by using two similar words ‘signature’ and ‘signiture’. In his script, at one place he defined as ‘signature’ and while running the script, he used the word ‘signiture’. Anyone can understand this bogus proof easily just by having a careful look on the script that he portrayed.

 

6. John McAfee, a famous personality in computer programming and McAfee group, publicly denied the claims of Craig. He said the definitely, Craig is not the real Satoshi Nakamoto. He further added that he knew who the true Satoshi is. He has known him from the past. As per him, Satoshi is neither a committee nor the Craig Wright. Satoshi is a single and very intelligent individual.

 

7. There is no special event for Craig to prove that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. If he was the real Satoshi, he could have presented him in the public in the past when the bitcoin was on the peak. Also, when asked about the same in an interview, Craig Wright has no proper answer to it. Why would a person hide his identity when his creation was ruling the world and all of a sudden he would reveal his identity having no special event or reason? This is really not acceptable of Craig’s claims.

 

8. In one of the papers published by real Satoshi, he mentioned about some age of twenties. If this is taken as the age of Satoshi at that time then, this makes an incompatible age difference between Craig and the real Satoshi. Craig has his year of birth as 1970 and the paper published was in 2009-2010. So, if this assumption of the word twenty and age in a single line to be talking about Satoshi’s age is assumed true, then for sure Craig is not Satoshi.

 

9. Craig has stopped claiming himself as Satoshi Nakamoto these days after a lot of people cam publicly and thrashed the claims made by Craig. In a recent interview when asked about a question that is he the real Satoshi, he refused to answer directly. He has already been titled as a ‘faketoshi’! Why a person would refuse to accept his own identity even if some people of a society are not believing him? It is very difficult to digest.

 

10. The same day, when Craig Wright published his fake public cryptographic proof to claim as the real Satoshi and met Gavin Andresen, one news came that Anderson’s commit access to the Bitcoin Core was removed and the core team was concerned that it was probably hacked. This also gives the sign that Craig’s proof was not so much true and maybe someone on his behalf tried to hack bitcoin core accesses to steal some data and help Craig to claim.

Continue Reading

#Bitcoin

Craig Wright Exposed by WikiLeaks

Published

on

WikiLeaks posted on twitter about Craig Wright, the self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto, disclosing his fake and altered blog post from 2008.

WikiLeaks posted on twitter about Craig Wright, the self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto, disclosing his fake and altered blog post from 2008. According to WikiLeaks, the post was forged by Craig Wright to claim that he is the inventor of bitcoin and has been working on cryptocurrencies since 2008.

WikiLeaks is an international non-profit organization that publishes secret information, news leaks, and classified media provided by anonymous sources. WikiLeaks was one of the first organizations to start accepting bitcoin after the American government had forced Mastercard and Visa to carry out transactions for the organization. According to WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, Wikileaks made 50,000% return on bitcoin that it has invested in 2010.

Tweet by WikiLeaks:

Craig Wright was exposed in a tweet by WikiLeaks yesterday which shows that the blog post which Craig Wright used to prove his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of bitcoin is a forged blog post. WikiLeaks also stated that Craig Wright is a serial forger of documents and has been repeatedly caught.

Craig Wright Responds:

Craig Wright responded to the tweet by WikiLeaks stating WikiLeaks is a fake news site. He said that organizations such as WikiLeaks have freedom of speech. He also stated that a pseudo leak site such as WikiLeaks should not even exist.

Craig-Wright-SS

Craig-Wright-SS

Continue Reading

Trending